Table of Contents
Hope this guide can help you if you are facing a google human error issue.
Approved
Weekend,
It made it clear that the mighty Google, one of the most popular search engines in the world, is error prone. After a period on Saturday where nearly all search results were tagged with a warning that search directories “could damage your computer,” Marissa Mayer, Google’s deputy director of research products and user education, made a blog statement about the company: which explained the human incident. a mistake.
She explained that Google maintains a list of known services to install malware in the background or “otherwise secretly.” This should be done both manually and automatically. Google is working with a non-profit organization to target a malicious web interface called StopBadware.org to create specifications to maintain this list. The organization then provides webmasters with simple procedures to remove their site from the list.
“We regularly update the information and release the site update this morning,” she wrote. “Sorry (and this is our mistake), the URL ‘/’ was not saved correctly to to the value directly in the file, and “/” is expanded to all URLs. Consequently, between 6:30 AM PST and 7:25 AM PST, the message “This site may damage your computer” was accompanied by all likely results a Google user found. Users who tried to click the Satisfy button saw a warning window. ” An interstitial ad “that mentioned a malware opportunity. She wrote.” As we tweak these updates, bugs started showing up between 6:27 am and 6:40 am and started disappearing between 7:10 am and 7:25 am, the duration of the problem for a specific specification was about 40 minutes. ”
To anyone who usually thinks Google is the only search engine worth searching, almost 45 minutes must have seemed like an eternity. Mayer apologized to all affected users and their owners. Money from websites whose pages have been mislabeled. “We are thoroughly investigating my incident and will conduct a deeper background check so that this does not happen again,” she wrote abouton the. Germanov, head of corporate networking in Framingham, Massachusetts. Information technology analyst firm IDC says many of the new methods do not yet have the same codified operating procedure marks designed to ensure stability, resulting in errors like Google’s. “What you see is a coherent operational trap that inspires levels that are associated with more rigor than what has been suggested in the past,” he says. “Those familiar with this problem might bet that tests will be implemented to prevent this stupid mistake from happening again.” Software quality meant never just knowing if the software knew what to do, even if it was holding me back from doing something really stupid. “That half second is a completely different way of thinking than the classic way of thinking,” he says. “We will see this thanks to Google and many online services.” Google’s visibility and user location also exacerbate the problem, he said.When gambling happens. On Smart Tuesday, a bug in Conferencing WebEx (a web-based company) software could be read by several thousand people, but Germanou says it’s hard to hide the misunderstanding due to Google’s ubiquity. “The scale of how many people notice a lot is greater,” she says. â € œGoogle Saturday morning? Millions of people are looking for them. ”
There was some confusion over the weekend as to who is responsible and how involved StopBadware.org is in Google’s operations. Google released a series of updates to the original after StopBadware.org’s director of filing, Maxim Weinstein, posted concrete evidence that Gooled falsely claimed that most of them have a list of URLs infected with Harvard University malware.
He thanked Google. for their efforts to correct the statement and reaffirmed their support for the mainstream search engine and its efforts to protect individual customers. “The error in Google’s previous statement that we provide children with malware data is a widespread misconception.m “, – he wrote. “Despite today’s loophole, we continue to support Google’s motivation to actively warn users as well as malicious sites, and in our experience, they strive to do so as accurately and honestly as possible. “Germanow says the types of misunderstandings that led to the Google panic on Saturday morning will continue as networked software systems mature and mature,” he says. “What I was looking for was not necessarily ‘It will never come back’, but rather ‘How did you react? »” Have you lived, studied or lived and, of course, studied?
